A quick look at the score shows that Berio devised special notation for the vocal sounds, produced both into and away from the instrument. There are also bracketed vowels, [u], [a] and [i], which must be either "vocalized in a perceptible way" or produced through the trombone. Musically, it quickly becomes clear how "warum" became "why": by using these vowel sounds, Berio can produce ghostly "whys" fairly easily. He also directs the performer to use a metal plunger (or wah-wah) mute, which has its own "on/off" line at the bottom of the score. This is another means by which the composer produces "whys", as well as a more veiled, less brassy tone, further blurring the line between what is played and what is sung. The sung/played/plungered "whys" are particularly prominent in the first part of the work, although there are ghostly echoes in the less frenetic second section. Berio plays with our expectations, giving us a mixture of [u]s, [ua]s and [uai]s, as well as, at one point, a full, spoken "WHY?", marking the divide between the two sections (marked A and B). For a brief moment, Grock takes centre stage.
I first heard Sequenza V in the early 90s, when I picked up Christian Lindberg's 1984 CD, The Virtuoso Trombone. The Berio is the final track; before that comes an appropriately diverse selection of serious and lighter fare (Hindemith and Martin, alongside Arthur Pryor's variations on The Blue Bells Of Scotland and Lindberg's frankly ridiculous double-tongued version of The Flight Of The Bumble-Bee). This impressive performance of the sequenza is one of the fastest on record: he gets through the whole thing in just 5'18". As a result, the quickfire exchanges of the first part are thrillingly dynamic, almost suggesting a second player. The slower-moving B section is also immaculate, particularly when it comes to managing the tricky balance between the sung and the played.
In 1998, Deutsche Grammophon released a boxset of the (then) complete sequenzas, including the Sequenza V of Ensemble Intercontemporain trombonist, Benny Sluchin. It's another scrupulously accurate version, with the added benefit of excellent recorded sound, which really helps when it comes to hearing the full effect of the multiphonics.(4) Despite being a fair bit slower overall, Sluchin generally takes a similar approach to Lindberg, moving fairly swiftly in the first part, and smoothing out the second, despite the odd more violent interruption.(5)
Vinko Globokar's 1967 premiere recording (Wergo) is something different. A full 2'10" longer than Lindberg's, it is also much more overtly theatrical. Employing a rawer, brassier tone, he seizes on every opportunity to shock - in this version, the louder outbursts really erupt. In the second section, after the "WHY?", Globokar really digs in. Berio's sung and spoken slides become slow smears, giving the music a pained quality that feels a long way from the generally more streamlined traversal of Lindberg and Sluchin. It's an essential listen for anyone interested in the piece, but sadly, it doesn't seem to be easily available online (it's this one). Fortunately, his Deutsche Grammophon remake is on YouTube. It's similar in style, if not quite as arresting as the original. Stuart Dempster's 2006 recording is part of a set of the complete sequenzas on the Mode label (including no. XIV for cello, from 2002). It's superbly played: Dempster matches Lindberg's nimble virtuosity, and is brilliantly recorded. At 5'01", he's faster still, resulting in a B section that has some of the pinballing drive and drama we usually only hear in the first part. Highly recommended.(6)
Recording the sequenza in the safety of a studio is one thing; playing it for a live audience is quite another. The score contains extensive notes for prospective performers, detailing the many extended techniques involved, and offering staging suggestions from both Berio and Dempster. The composer suggests the performer should be in "white tie," with a "spot from above etc." In the A section, they should "strike the poses of a variety showman about to sing an old favourite." Berio also highlights the score instructions to raise and lower the instrument (both quickly and slowly), which may well be a nod to Grock's musical routines, in which he often prepared to play, before aborting. The B section should be performed seated, "as though rehearsing in an empty hall." Dempster gives detailed suggestions on lighting, as well as how to play the opening notes ("like gunshots") and how to bow at the end ("stiff and aloof"). In his excellent article on the piece, trombonist Barrie Webb compares the visual aspects of Dempster's and Globokar's performances, noting that Dempster "dressed in tails, would enter in quite agitated fashion." Globokar, on the other hand, "always presented in normal dress and with an absence of showmanship" (intriguing given my response to his CD recording). Webb cautions against an approach that "says more about the performer than the piece," adding that "too much gratuitous clowning - entertaining as it may be - creates an (unintended) empathy with the audience which could seriously detract from the impact of the music." Globokar backs him up: "Berio did not think about any kind of clothes or any kind of theatralisation, only standing, sitting and the gesture up and down. When I saw the first time somebody who did it in a clownesque way, I found it superfluous, not necessary, because the piece is so strong musically."(7)
Despite these concerns, in the almost 60 years since the first performance, many trombonists have been unable to resist the temptation to go "full clown", particularly when it comes to dress. Indeed, you will struggle to find a YouTube version that doesn't go down this road. Here's Christian Lindberg, with another impressive account. Costume and make-up aside, this is pretty much in line with the Berio/Dempster conception of the piece, with Lindberg seen "rehearsing in an empty hall." Aside from a few close-ups at the beginning, the performance is simply filmed, sticking to a handful of basic shots. Gerard Costes, by contrast, gives us something of a multimedia extravaganza, centred on Grock. It begins with a montage of Grock clips, while the performance itself takes place in a room full of TV screens showing yet more Grock. It's well worth a watch, but, for me, it's all too busy - the rapid cuts between cameras and superimposed pictures of Grock tend to distract from what is actually a very fine performance. See what you think.
The recording by Gabriele Marchetti presents the piece as an interruption to a standard orchestral concert. Marchetti enters to much nervous laughter, which continues throughout the somewhat manic performance.(8) At the end, the orchestra go straight into another piece, giving the audience little chance to reflect on what just happened. Deb Scott's audience are similarly shocked by her appearance, and, like Marchetti, she plays up to it, tripping up the stairs, and letting the trombone slide fall off, before pretending to use it to bow the bell, like a cello. Scott's excellent performance (impressive circular breathing) is the first I've heard by a female trombonist, raising the interesting question of how the sung lines could and should be modified for female performers. That said, if I'm not mistaken, Scott manages to sing the majority of it at the written pitch.
While some of these clips play fast and loose with the score instructions, there's a lot to enjoy, and any filmed performance is a useful reminder of the huge challenges (and rewards) involved. When the piece is done well, "instrument and voice, instrument and breathing, indeed, instrument and the whole body [are] inseparably blended together," as composer Henri Pousseur puts it in his liner notes for Globokar's first recording of the piece. In recent days, I've returned to Pousseur's interesting essay a few times, partly because, while getting lost in multiple recorded versions, it's helped to focus my listening, and to remind me of this music's special qualities. I'm particularly drawn to his intriguing suggestion that Sequenza V is: "unquestionably closer to electronic music than to those indispensable trombones of the underworld in Monteverdi's Orfeo." He goes on to describe it as "a completely continuous and wholly uninterrupted tone modulation."(9) This chimes with me: music this multi-faceted invites a variety of interpretations, but I most often hear it as a study in extraordinary tone colour. It really does resemble early electronic music, although the heroics of Berio's fabulous one-man band, and the kindly shadow of Grock, add an extra dimension to this strange and beautiful piece.
(1) The story of the two trombonists' involvement is quite complicated. See page 47 of this fascinating dissertation for more.
(2) From a film clip of Berio, quoted in Barrie Webb - "Performing Berio's Sequenza V" in Contemporary Music Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, April 2007.
(3) This clip isn't quite as Berio describes, but it's still good to have.
(4) In the B section, Berio often has the sung and played pitches slowly pass one another, producing distinctive beating, fluttering tones - especially prominent in this recording.
(5) There is a YouTube video of the Sluchin performance synchronised with the score here. If you haven't seen it, do have a look - it's a work of art.
(6) I have one further audio-only recording to recommend. It's by Byron Fulcher, and comes as part of a BBC "Discovering Music" programme. Having skilled performers on hand gives host Stephen Johnson the opportunity to explore three sequenzas using audio examples - particularly useful for studying the ways they are organised harmonically and melodically. Trombonist Fulcher gives demonstrations of some of the extended techniques involved, before a very fine full performance of the piece.
(7) All quotes here from Webb, 2007.
(2) From a film clip of Berio, quoted in Barrie Webb - "Performing Berio's Sequenza V" in Contemporary Music Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, April 2007.
(3) This clip isn't quite as Berio describes, but it's still good to have.
(4) In the B section, Berio often has the sung and played pitches slowly pass one another, producing distinctive beating, fluttering tones - especially prominent in this recording.
(5) There is a YouTube video of the Sluchin performance synchronised with the score here. If you haven't seen it, do have a look - it's a work of art.
(6) I have one further audio-only recording to recommend. It's by Byron Fulcher, and comes as part of a BBC "Discovering Music" programme. Having skilled performers on hand gives host Stephen Johnson the opportunity to explore three sequenzas using audio examples - particularly useful for studying the ways they are organised harmonically and melodically. Trombonist Fulcher gives demonstrations of some of the extended techniques involved, before a very fine full performance of the piece.
(7) All quotes here from Webb, 2007.
(8) Like clowns, trombonists have a long history of operating in a space between the serious and the humorous. The instrument is often tasked with light relief (raspberries and disruptive glissandi) as well as more weighty, dignified material.
(9) Creating this stream of sound requires considerable ingenuity from Berio, and (again) very considerable skill on the part of the performer. Berio covers the gaps by having the player breathe audibly through the instrument, or by making them rattle the metal mute in the bell of the trombone.
(9) Creating this stream of sound requires considerable ingenuity from Berio, and (again) very considerable skill on the part of the performer. Berio covers the gaps by having the player breathe audibly through the instrument, or by making them rattle the metal mute in the bell of the trombone.